APHC010380962019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 977/2019 Between: 1. GARAPATI SHARATH CHANDRA, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,R/O 9-133, RAVI NAGAR, NAIDU THOTA,VEPAGUNTA,VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M VENKATESWARA RAO, Executive Officer, Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Vari Devastanam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam Dist. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to To summon the Respondents and punish them under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully violating the order dated 03.04.2018 in I.A. No. 1/2018 in WP. No. 10967/2018 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 2 NV,J C.C.NO.977 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondent herein not to interfere with the lands of the petitioner in Sy. No.77/10-A1, Part to an extent of Ac. 2.00 cents situated at Vepagunta Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam Dist. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 3 NV,J C.C.NO.977 OF 2019 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:977/2019 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed challenging the non- implementation of the interim order dated 03.04.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.10967 of 2018. 2. Pending the contempt case, the main Writ Petition is disposed of on 05.05.2023 by observing as under: “7. In that view of the matter, all the writ petitions are disposed of granting liberty to respondent No.2-temple to approach the Endowments Tribunal for redressal of its grievance with regard to title over the subject land. Till a decision is taken by the Endowments Tribunal, the respondents are restrained from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject land.” 3. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, no further orders are required in this contempt case. 4 NV,J C.C.NO.977 OF 2019 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 LLSSPP 5 NV,J C.C.NO.977 OF 2019 322 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:977/2019 31.03.2026 LLSSPP