APHC010369212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 816/2021 Between: 1. A HUSSAIN PEERA, S/O SATHAR SAHEB AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR 0/0 MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, KADIRI, ANANTAPURARNU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT. ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOLAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH . 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): to declare the inaction of the respondent No.3 in considering the applicant for promotion to the post of Deputy Tahsildar while promoting his juniors as illegal, arbitrary and also in contravention of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to promote the applicant to the post of Deputy Tahsildar with all consequential benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 10-5-2017 in O.A.No.1281/2017 Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. T K ANURADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following order: The petitioner originally filed O.A.No.1281 of 2017 on the file of learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad (for short „the Tribunal‟) to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Deputy Tahsildar while promoting his juniors, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. After the abolition of the Tribunal, the O.A. was transferred to High Court and the same is numbered as W.P.(APAT).No.816 of 2021. 3. The writ petition was listed on 23.01.2026, however, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and at the request of the learned Assistant Government Pleader. The writ petition was directed to be listed on 06.02.2026. On 06.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition was directed to be listed on 13.02.2026, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even on 13.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. To give one more opportunity, the writ petition was adjourned to today. 4. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 5. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI 3 172 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION (AT) NO:816/2021 Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI