Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22721 (KAR)

SRI K RAJANNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/26280/2025 · 2026-06-17

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29474 WP No. 26280 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.26280 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. RAJANNA S/O LATE KAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILAGE (KADATHANAMAKLE DAKALE) HESARAGHATTA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT PIN-560064 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARADARAJA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29474 WP No. 26280 of 2025 BENGALURU-560009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA YELAHANKA BENGALURU-560064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 07.05.2025 IN NO. 94C/CR/61/2004-05 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK YELAHANKA A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-Q; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the Endorsement dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure-Q) issued by respondent No.4. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29474 WP No. 26280 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner refers to the temporary allotment letter produced at Annexure-G. However, a perusal of the Endorsement would indicate that the petitioner has put up construction in a Sarkari Kaluve (Government drain/channel). Therefore, the respondents have refused to issue a permanent Hakku Patra in terms of the Resolution passed by respondent No.3 on 17.04.2025. 5. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that there is no infirmity or illegality in the Endorsement dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure-Q) issued by respondent No.4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21