1 2026:CGHC:25285 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2961 of 2026 1 - Shri Hashib Shah, S/o- Late Rojit, Aged About 48 Years R/o- Village Ropakhar, Tahsil- Mainpath, District- Surguja (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Of The Revenue Department Capital Complex Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Collector Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). 3 - Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue)) Sitapur,district- Surguja (C.G.). 4 - The Tahsildar Mainpath, District- Surguja (C.G.). 5 - President Forest Right Committee, Village Ropakhar, Tahsil- Mainpath, District- Surguja (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sanskriti Pawar, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anadi Shrama, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 22/06/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the present Petitioner from the Respondent authorities concerned for kind perusal. 10.2 The Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ / writs, order / orders, direction / directions, and set-aside impugned notice dated 16.04.2026 (ANNEXURE P-1), issued by the Respondent No.04, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may further be pleased to direct the respondent authority to grant the lease to the petitioner or pass any other order in favour of petitioner as it may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case with cost. 10.4 Pass any other order under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous and as such learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat