Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22719 (KAR)

MRS. CHANDANA H P v. MR. VINOD KUMAR H P

WP/20560/2021 · 2026-06-19

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30314 W.P. No.20560/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.20560/2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MRS. CHANDANA H.P. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS W/O DR. RAJESH S NO.882, 29TH MAIN 34TH CROSS, POORNAPRAJNA LAYOUT UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560065. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIVEK B.N. ADV., FOR SRI. ABHINAV R, ADV.,) AND: 1. MR. VINOD KUMAR H.P. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE SRI. N. PUTTASWAMY NO.728, 14TH CROSS VBHCS LAYOUT GIRINAGAR 2ND PHASE BENGALURU-560085. 2. DR. CHANCHALA H.P. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O DR. MANESSH S. GIRI NO.147, MUDA EMPLOYEES LAYOUT PADUVANA ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGAR MYSURU-570023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANJAYA S. NAYAKA, ADV., FOR SRI. H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADV., FOR R1 R2 DR. CHANCHALA H.P. SD AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30314 W.P. No.20560/2021 DATED 28.10.2021 PASSED CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-61) AT BENGALURU IN O.S.NO.5727/2021 AT ANNEXURE-M AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE I.A.NO.1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF TE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 IN O.S.NO.5727/2021 PENDING BEFORE THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-61) AT BENGALURU, BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has oral instruction that the application for temporary injunction has been considered by the trial Court and that an order of injunction has been granted in favour of the petitioner. 2. In view of the said submission, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition.. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28