Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22718 (KAR)

SHRI. B R MANJUNATH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18275/2026 · 2026-06-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29943 WP No. 18275 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18275 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. B R MANJUNATH S/O B G RAMADAS, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/AT BELALAMPALLI VILLAGE & POST, CHELURU HOBALI, BAGEPALLI TALUK, NOW IN CHELURU TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISHA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRL., SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, CHIKKABALLAPURA PIN CODE 562 110 Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29943 WP No. 18275 of 2026 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS CHELURU TALUK MINI VIDHANASUDA, BAGEPALLI TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, PIN CODE 563 1244 4. THE THASILDAR CHELURU TALUK CHELURU, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, PIN CODE 563 124 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA , AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN PASSING IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 02.06.2026 IN NO. BHU.SA NI/TAKARARU/HIM/01/2025-26 ISSUED BY THE PASSED BY THE R3 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the Endorsement dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure-A) passed - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29943 WP No. 18275 of 2026 by the respondent No.3 - Assistant Director of Land Records. 3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is not in dispute that the 11-E sketch has been prepared by the respondent No.3 based on schedule in the civil suit. However, taking into consideration, there are two suits pending consideration before the competent civil court at Bagepalli in O.S.No.176/2019 and O.S.No.173/2019, I am of the view that, the 11E sketch prepared by the respondent No.3 is subject to the outcome of the judgment and decree that may be passed by the competent civil court in the aforementioned suits. Accordingly, I do not find no merit in this writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43