2026:HHC:38818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb. Appeal No. 15 of 2011 & OMP No. 633 of 2026 Date of decision: 11.09.2026 _____________________________________________________________________________ Ram Pal Shukla ...Appellant-applicant. Versus Neelam Shukla …Respondent. ____________________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Sanjivini Sood, Mr. Vidur Kapur and Ms. Tamanna Basoli, Advocates. __________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge An application, i.e., OMP No. 633 of 2026 has been filed on behalf of appellant-applicant, supported by an affidavit, stating therein that applicant-appellant does not want to continue with present appeal and, therefore, same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that they have no objection to allow the prayer, subject to observation that dismissal of 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:38818 this appeal is unconditional, having no prejudice against the rights of the respondent. 3. In view of above, unconditional prayer for withdrawal of present appeal is accepted and, accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, without any prejudice to the right of the respondent, on account of withdrawal of appeal. Appeal as well as application stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 11th September, 2026 (Susheel)