IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20501 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-672 Year-2025 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Yash Kumar Son of Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Prasad @ Vikas Kumar Resident of Village - Shivganj, P.S. - Ara Nawada, Distt. - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.672 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111, 109, 132 & 3(5) of the BNS and under Sections 25(1-AAA), 25(1-B)(a), 26(2), 35 & 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police received secret information that certain miscreants have gathered for extorting money from the boatmen carrying goods. Police reached there and it is alleged that there was firing from both sides and from possession of this petitioner one rifle and five live cartridges were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20501 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.08.2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases of excise. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur at Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 672 of 2025. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T