Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22708 (PAT)

Dilip Paswan @ Dilip Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./44717/2026 · 2026-07-06

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44717 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2025 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Dilip Paswan @ Dilip Kumar, S/o Rajeshwar Paswan, Resident Of Village- Jitwarpur, PS- Govindganj, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 06-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No.228 of 2025 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. 3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is recovery of 20 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the seized illicit liquor was recovered from a cattle shed, which is an open place accessible to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44717 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026 2/3 general public and, therefore, it cannot be said that the alleged recovery was made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that seizure list also appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses rather than by police personnel. It is also pointed out that the name of the petitioner surfaced solely on the disclosure made by a local Chaukidar. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature, in which, he is on bail. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I, Motihari, East Champaran Patna High Court CR. MISC. MISC. No.44717 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026 3/3 in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No.228 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Raushan/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) U T