Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22708 (AP)

L.NAGESWARA NAIK DIED v. STATE OF AP,PRL.SCY,C.S.,HYD,& 4

WP/13644/2015 · 2026-03-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RC,J W.P.No.13644 of 2015 1 APHC010369122015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13644/2015 Between: 1. L.NAGESWARA NAIK DIED, S/O.RAMA NAIK, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC F.P.S DEALER, R/O DAIDA VILLAGE, GURAJALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. LAVURI ADINARAYANA NAIK, S/O. L. NAGESWARA NAYAK (LATE), AGE 41YRS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/O. 2-34, S.T. COLONY DAIDA, DAIDA, GUNTUR - A.P-522415. 3. LAVURI SAIDA NAIK, S/O. L. NAGESWARA NAYAK (LATE), AGE 36YRS, OCC NOT KNOWN R/O. 2-128 DAIDA, DAIDA, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH, 522415. 4. LAVURI PADMAVATHI, D/O. L. NAGESWARA NAYAK (LATE), AGE 33YRS. OCC HOUSE WIFE R/O. KOTHURU, PASUVEMULA, GUNTUR, MANCHERIA, A.P. 5. LAVURI LAKSHMI BAYAMMA, W/O. L. NAGESWARA NAYAK (LATE), AGE 62YRS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O. H.NO. 2-128, DAIDA, GURAZALLA, GUNTUR, A.P. PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS PER LRS OF DECEASED SOLE PETITIONER AS PER COURT ORDER DT.23.03.2026 IN IA.NO.1 OF 2025 ...PETITIONER(S) AND RC,J W.P.No.13644 of 2015 2 1. STATE OF AP PRL SCY C S HYD 4, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.PSECRETARIAT BUILDING, AT HYDERABAD. 2. THE COLLECTOR, O/O.COLLECTOR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DIST. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, O/O JOINT COLLECTOR,COLLECRATE COMPOUND, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER GURAJALA GUNTUR DIST, - 5. THE TAHSILDAR, GURUZALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 6. LAVURI LAKSHMI BAYAMMA, W/O. L. NAGESWARA NAYAK (LATE), AGE 62YRS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O. H.NO. 2-128, DAIDA, GURAZALLA, GUNTUR, A.P. PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS PER LRS OF DECEASED SOLE PETITIONER AS PER COURT ORDER DT.23.03.2026 IN IA.NO.1 OF 2025 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in issuing the 6A proceedings dated 23-04-2015 to this Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional of India and consequently direct the respondents to restore the authorization to this Petitioner and supply the Essential Commodities to the Fair Price Shop.No.2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 17907 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the 6A proceedings dated 23-04-2015 issued by the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 17908 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to RC,J W.P.No.13644 of 2015 3 direct the respondents to supply the Essential Commodities to the Petitioner pending disposal of the main Writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to bring the Petitioner No. 2 to 5 on record as Legal representatives of the deceased/petitioner No. 1 in above W.P.No. 13644 of 2015 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.4 in the Writ Petition No. 13644 of 2015 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A SAMIR KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: RC,J W.P.No.13644 of 2015 4 ORDER Sri G.V.Gangadhar, learned counsel, representing Sri A.Samir Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, appeared virtually and submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to cots. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSETICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 31st March, 2026. RR