APHC010375712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1756/2021 Between: 1. P.HANUMANTHA RAO, , S/O. LATE SRI RAMUNAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, DOOR NO. 1-121, JAMMU VILLAGE AND POST, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. M PRABHAKARA RAO, The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately violating the order of this Hon'ble court passed in IA No. 1 of 2020 in W.P. No. 11595 dated 21-07-2020 passed by his Lordships JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PENJURI VENUGOPAL 2 NJS,J C.C.NO.1756 OF 2021 Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. P SUBASH The Court made the following: 3 NJS,J C.C.NO.1756 OF 2021 ORDER Heard Mr.Penjuri Venugopal, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr.P.Subash, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This Court passed an order dated 21.07.2020 in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.11595 of 2020 directing the 4th respondent therein/respondent herein to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 06.06.2020. Alleging non- compliance of the said order, the present contempt case is filed in the month of October, 2021. 3. In the reply affidavit, the respondent stated that the orders referred to above have been complied with and the representation of the petitioner was disposed of and an endorsement dated 24.09.2021 was also issued. 4. As per the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent and the material enclosed to the reply affidavit, it is clear that the said endorsement was communicated to the petitioner through Registered Post dated 22.10.2021. 5. In view of the same, no case is made out against the respondent for punishment under the Contempt of Court Act. 4 NJS,J C.C.NO.1756 OF 2021 6. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 12.02.2026 LSP