Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2270 (HP)

AMAR NATH v. UNION OF INDIA

CWP/1628/2013 · 2026-02-28

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:5000-DB 2026:HHC:4998-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1628 of 2013 a/w CWP No.1629 of 2013 Decided on: 28.02.2026 CWP No.1628 of 2013 Amar Nath … Petitioner Versus Union of India and others … Respondents CWP No.1629 of 2013 Raj Kumar … Petitioner Versus Union of India and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner(s): Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate, in both the petitions. For the respondent(s): Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for the respondents, in CWP No.1628 of 2013. Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for the respondents, in CWP No.1629 f 2013. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) These petitions, as prayed for, are being disposed of by common order. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the claim of the petitioners for grant of Assured Career Progression Scheme stands rejected on the ground that the petitioners are not possessing the minimum qualification of matriculation, which is being agitated by them. Learned Counsel further submitted that 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:5000-DB 2026:HHC:4998-DB similar case has been decided by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi against the employee therein who, thereafter, preferred Special Leave Petition No.16888 of 2018, titled Ravinder Singh & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors., which is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Learned Counsel also submitted that these petitions can be disposed of with the observation that the parties herein shall also be governed by the adjudication by the Hon’ble Supreme Curt of India in the above matter. It was not disputed on behalf of the respondents that indeed, the issue raised by the petitioners herein is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by way of Special Leave Petition. Therefore, these petitions are disposed of with the observation that the parties herein shall also abide by the outcome of the proceedings pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, reference whereof has been given hereinabove. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 28, 2026 (Rishi)