Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22699 (HP)

ARMAN v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CRMPM/1653/2026 · 2026-09-10

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 1653 of 2026 Decided on :10.09.2026 Arman .... Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. None for the victim. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he want to withdraw the present petition because the statement of victim has been recorded before the learned trial Court and he wants to file a bail petition before the learned trial Court. 2. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending application (s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 10th September, 2026. (ravinder)