APHC010380662024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3542/2024 Between: 1. NAIDU GIRIJAMMA, W/O.LATE NAIDU DASARADHARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.25-2-233, CHAITHANYAPURI COLONY, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M SURYA TEJA, COMMISSIONER, THE NELLORE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. DASAIAH, THE TOWN PLANNNIG OFFICER, NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. BOMMI NAGA KISHORE, S/O. RADHAIAH, MANAGING TRUSTEE NELLORE DISTRICT YADAV BHAVAN TRUST, R/O. D.NO.16-3-1518, 1ST STREET, HARANADHAPURAM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed in W.P.No.29937/2023 dt.24.01.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH p. 2 SRS,J Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA 2. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed in August 2024, contending that despite the interim order, dated 24.01.2024, the respondent herein proceeded with the construction and respondents 1 and 2 failed to initiate any action, thereby the respondents violated the interim order, dated 24.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.29937 of 2023. 2. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not taking action against the illegal and unauthorized construction undertaken by respondent No.4 in land of an extent of Ac1-52 cents in survey No.24/2, Padarupalli Village, Nellore, SPSR District, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Based on the instructions submitted by the learned standing counsel for the Corporation that no permission was granted in favour of respondent No.4 in the writ petition, this Court passed an interim order, dated 24.01.2024. 4. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent No.1. It was stated that respondent No.3 herein made construction up to ground floor slab level p. 3 SRS,J and stopped further construction, pursuant to the interim order, dated 24.01.2024. 5. Sri G. Venkat Sai Kiran, learned counsel for respondent No.3 submitted that the construction was made up to the ground floor slab level and further construction was stopped after the interim order was passed. 6. Thus, as seen from the counter of respondent No.1 as well as instructions of the Assistant City Planner, Nellore Municipal Corporation, respondent No.3 stopped construction in pursuance of the interim order, dated 24.01.2024. 7. Hence, this Court does not find any violation of interim order dated 24.01.2024. Accordingly, this contempt case stands dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.02.2026 IKN p. 4 SRS,J THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3542 of 2024 Date: 05.02.2026 IKN