Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22692 (KAR)

SMT PUTTAGANGAMMA v. DHARMACHAND

RSA/560/2021 · 2026-06-17

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29896 RSA No. 560 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 560 OF 2021 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. PUTTAGANGAMMA W/O LATE K.T. SHIVAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/A NO.669, 10TH CROSS WEST OF CHORD ROAD 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 086. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S.R. HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DHARMACHAND S/O MITTALAL BMBAKI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/O NO.41/2, VADDARAHALLI DASANAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. 2. SRI. LAKSHMILAL S/O MITTALAL BAMBAKI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 3. SRI. L. SURENDRA KUMAR S/O MITTALAL BAMBAKI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29896 RSA No. 560 of 2021 4. SRI. BHIKEMCHAND S/O MITTALAL BAMBAKI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 5. SRI. SAMPHATLAL S/O MITTALAL BAMBAKI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 6. SRI. VRIDHICHAND @ VIMAL KUMAR S/O MITTALAL BAMBAKI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 7. SMT. SAVITHA KUMARI W/O LATE HIRLAL AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 8. SRI. THEJMAL S/O MITTALAL BAMBAKI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT NO.355 4TH MAIN ROAD SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 080. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NATARAJA H.T, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R8 (ABSENT)) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.03.2021PASSED IN RA.NO.52/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE NELAMANGALA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.09.2019 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29896 RSA No. 560 of 2021 PASSED IN OS.NO.341/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., NELAMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Despite granting sufficient time, paper books are not filed. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9