Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22691 (KAR)

GARIMA MISHRA v. APARMAYA SHUKLA

MFA/1941/2026 · 2026-06-12

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28849 MFA No. 1941 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1941 OF 2026 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. GARIMA MISHRA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, W/O. APARMAYA SHUKLA, R/AT. NO. FLAT E5-903, SNN RAJ GREENBAY APARTMENTS, ELECTRONIC CITY, PHASE-2, BANGALORE-560100 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. OMRAN GULAM AHMED KHAN.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. APARMAYA SHUKLA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O. DR. SUSHIL KUMAR SHUKLA, R/AT. NO. 5-B, KASTURBANAGAR, NEAR TUBEWELL SIGRA, CHITTUPUR, MAHMOOR GANJ, VARANASI, UTTAR PRADESH-221010 ALSO AT FLAT NO. 534, RAINDROPS APARTMENTS, HARALUR ROAD, AMBALIPURA, BANGALORE-560100 ALSO AT FLAT D-605, Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28849 MFA No. 1941 of 2026 SOLARPURIA SYMPHONY APARTMENTS PRAGATHINAGAR, BASAPURA, ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE- 560100 ALSO AT A-1203, SOLARPURIA SYMPHONY APARTMENT, PRAGATHINAGAR, BASAPURA, ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE- 560100 …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.I IN OS.NO. 2244/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE I.A.NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28849 MFA No. 1941 of 2026 2. Accepting the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty as sought for. Time spent herein shall be condoned. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22