IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.688 of 2026 Date of decision: 18.03.2026 Reena Kumari. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Meghna Kashava, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. : Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has been allowed to appear in the examination, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of being infructuous along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 18th March, 2026 (Pardeep) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes