SRI V T MUNIVENKATAPPA v. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WP/35189/2024 · 2026-06-18
M Nagaprasanna, Venkatesh Naik T
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22670 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22670 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30074-DB WP No. 35189 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO. 35189 OF 2024 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI V T MUNIVENKATAPPA, S/O LATE THAMMAYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS.
2.
SRI V R HARISH GOWDA, S/O LATE V T RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.
BOTH R/AT NO.8, SRINIVASAGOWDA MAIN ROAD, VEERASAGARA, ATTUR POST, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI AVANI CHOKSHI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH COMMISSIONER, NO.20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020.
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30074-DB WP No. 35189 of 2024
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-4, DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH LAYOUT, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NO.20, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020.
3.
SRI R CHIKKANNA, S/O DODDA RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.
4.
SRI K R VEERABHADRAIAH, S/O DODDA RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.
BOTH RESPONDENTS NOS. 3 AND 4 R/AT NO.78, AECS LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, 1ST CROSS, NEXT TO AKAI PUBLIC SCHOOL, NAGASHETTY HALLI, BENGALURU-560094.
5.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, DISTRICT OFFICE RD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVAPRASAD M SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2 – BDA;
SRI S.S. HAVERI, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 & R-4;
SMT. HEMALATHA V, AGA FOR R-5)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30074-DB WP No. 35189 of 2024
CONFIRMATION LETTER BEARING NO.02484 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 (PLACED AT ANNEXURE-M) AND ANY AWARD OR ACTION CONSEQUENT/PURSUANT TO THE SAME AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer:
“1. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the confirmation letter bearing no.02484 issued by the Respondent No.2 (placed at Annexure-M) and any award or action consequent/pursuant to the same; and
2. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.2 to consider the Petitioners Representation dated 23/05/2024 (placed at Annexure-T) and consequently allot the Developed Sites in favour of the Petitioners as per the Scheme in respect of the Petitioners’ scheduled properties / land acquired by the Respondent No.2;
3. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.5 to take a time-bound decision in the Appeal numbered RA/YLK-424/2022 filed by the Petitioners (placed at annexure-j), within 3 months from the date of order passed by this Hon’ble Court; and,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30074-DB WP No. 35189 of 2024
4. Pass any other orders within the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity, including orders regarding compensation.”
2. Heard Sri Avani Chokshi, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Shivaprasad M. Shantanagoudar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri S.S.Haveri, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and Smt. Hemalatha V., learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.5.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due to efflux of time, prayer Nos.1 and 3 have been rendered infructuous. Therefore, the petition is thus, restricted for consideration of a representation by the petitioner submitted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 – Bengaluru Development Authority, seeking allotment of an alternate site.
4. In that light, we deem it appropriate to dispose the writ petition, with a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 - Bengaluru Development Authority to consider the representation of the petitioner for the purpose for which it is submitted, within an outer limit of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if not earlier.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30074-DB WP No. 35189 of 2024
5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands
disposed. Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11