Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2267 (BOM)

SHAMA PAWAR ALIAS SHAMA NASIR SHAIKH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/2193/2026 · 2026-08-20

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

909.ABA-2193.26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2193 OF 2026 Shama Pawar alias Shama Nasir Shaikh … Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra …. Respondent ______________________ Mr. Vaibhav Ugle a/w Mr. Prashant Mahajan, Mr. Vikas Somawanshi and Mr. Onkar Sonawane, for the Applicant. Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Amit Takawde, API attached to Dapodi Police Station, Pimpari Chinchwad present. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 20 AUGUST 2026 P. C. :- 1. At the outset, Ms. Yadav, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State states that although one antecedent has been disclosed in the anticipatory bail application, the other antecedent bearing C.R. No.102 of 2026 registered with Dapodi Police Station, Pimpari Chinchwad has not been disclosed in this anticipatory bail application. Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.08.21 12:44:09 +0530 909.ABA-2193.26.DOC 2. In view of the said contention raised by the learned APP, Mr.Vaibhav Ugle, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Anticipatory Bail Application. 3. Accordingly, leave as aforesaid is granted. 4. All the contentions of both the sides in the Anticipatory Bail Application are expressly kept open. 5. No coercive steps be taken against the Applicant till 7 September 2026. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 PPN