Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22669 (KAR)

KABBALAMMA DEVI TRUST v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/28492/2024 · 2026-06-16

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29157 WP No. 28492 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.28492 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KABBALAMMA DEVI TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS HON'BLE SECRETARY SRI. V. SIDDAIAH S/O LATE VENKATAIAH BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARAM - 562 159. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARAM SUB DIVISION RAMANAGARAM - 562 159. 3. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARAM TALUK RAMANAGARAM - 562159. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29157 WP No. 28492 of 2024 4. SMT. REVAMMA W/O DEVARAJ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. R/AT AVAREGERE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI AND TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 109. 5. SRI. DEVARAJ S/O LATE ANKAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A AVAREGERE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI AND TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 109. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO.RR TCR/707/2024 (E-384565) DATED 18.07.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - G BY ISSUING WRIT CERTIORARI; DIRECT THE THASILDAR TO RECONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS BY ISSUING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29157 WP No. 28492 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The impugned order passed by respondent No.3 is appealable under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Therefore, reserving liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the said efficacious remedy, if so advised, the Writ Petition is dismissed. 3. In the event of the petitioner availing the aforesaid remedy, the period spent by the petitioner before this Court shall stand condoned under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16