IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122) CWP-17920-2026 Date of Decision : May 29, 2026 Nirmal Singh Chauhan .. Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Barjesh Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Rawal, Sr. Panel Counsel, for respondent-UOI. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will avail appropriate remedy to challenge the order passed by the respondent-UOI by which, the transfer of the petitioner to Srinagar has not been changed so as to cause prejudice to the petitioner hence, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 2. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE May 29, 2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2026.06.01 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document