Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22665 (HP)

SURESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. RAM PRASHAD AND ANOTHER

CMP.M/1148/2026 · 2026-09-10

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Suresh Kumar & anr. Vs. Ram Prashad & anr. CMP(M) No.1148 of 2026 10.09.2026 Present: Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel, for respondent No.1. Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. CMP(M) No.1148 of 2026 Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of applicant No.1 Suresh Kumar, the same is allowed and the delay of 272 days in filing the appeal, which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. of 2026 (FAOST 31652/26) Appeal be registered. Call for the records. As prayed for, list on 12.10.2026. In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.2 be also filed. CMP No.____ of 2026(CMPST/31653/26) It be registered. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent No.2 prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 10, 2026 (V.Himalvi)