Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2266 (JK)

ABDUL RAZAQ TANTARY v. MOHAMMAD YOUSUF BHAT

CM(M)/297/2026 · 2026-07-21

Rahul Bharti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 140 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) No. 297/2026 CM No. 4460/2026 Abdul Razaq Tantray …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate Vs. Mohammad Yousuf Bhat ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 21.07.2026 1. Petitioner does not have the luxury of maintaining a supervisory petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India to assail cognizance taking order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Dangiwacha, Baramulla in a criminal complaint initiated by the respondent by reference to commission of offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as such this present petition is not entertained without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to opt for proper remedy enabling this Court to deal with ongoing criminal complaint which surely cannot be dealt with by this Court on the supervisory side jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Dismissed as such along with connected CM. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 21.07.2026 Imtiyaz Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 27.07.2026 12:35