1 2026:CGHC:2372-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 8 of 2026 1 - Usatlal Sahu S/o Shri Shri Ghanshyam Sahu, Aged About 37 Years, Occupation Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working at Government Primary School Suvarguda, Block Sarangarh, Distt. Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Commissioner, President of Rationalization Committee, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Joint Director/Secretary Divisional Rationalization Committee, Education Division Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Collector/President of District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The District Education Officer/Secretary of District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ President of Rationalization Committee, Tahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.01.15 19:52:33 +0530 2 7 - The Block Education Officer/Secretary of Rationalization Committee, Block Sarangarh, Distt. Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Shiv Kumar Bhoi, Occupation Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working at Government Primary School Surli, Block Sarangarh, Distt. Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate. For State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 15-01-2026 1. Heard Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents-State. 2. By way of present writ appeal under Section 2 of Sub-Section (1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006, the appellant, who was writ petitioner in the writ petition, has challenged the order dated 25-11-2025 passed by learned Single Judge in WPS No.12666/2025 (Usatlal Sahu Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others), by which the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner/appellant herein has been dismissed as infructuous by the learned Single Judge. 3 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the appellant wants to withdraw the instant appeal with the liberty to take recourse to law before the learned Single Judge. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil