[2026:JHHC:24000 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7546 of 2026 ------ Raj Sinha, aged about 29 years, Son of Anil Sinha, resident of Ward No. 24, Bypass Road, Baidyanath Pur, P.O. Baidyanath Pur & P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shwetang Tiwari, Advocate. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Saw, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-12-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dumka (T) P.S. Case No.162 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the Floor Manager in the showroom of a Gold & Diamond showroom, had taken a sum of Rs.13,30,500/- from the showroom for depositing in Bank, but he has not deposited the said amount and out of the said amount, the petitioner returned Rs.3,40,000/- in cash to the showroom, but fled away with the remaining amount of Rs.9,90,500/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.04.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka in connection with Dumka (T) P.S. Case No.162 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 12.08.2026 Amar/