Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22653 (HP)

NARESH KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/15732/2026 · 2026-09-11

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 15731 & 15732 of 2026 Decided on: 11.09.2026 1. CWP No. 15731 of 2026 RAvinder Kumar and Ors …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Anr. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… 2. CWP No. 15732 of 2026 Naresh Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Anr. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to count their contract services for the purpose of annual increments, seniority, promotion and all other consequential benefits. They seek applicability of the judgment rendered in Taj 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Mohammad and others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others2. It is an admitted position that “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024” has been quashed and set aside in Devinder Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.3 It is also a matter of record that State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors.4 instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do the needful in terms of the judgment. 2. In view of above, the present petitions are disposed of, at this stage, with direction to the respondents to pass consideration order, in accordance with the time-line indicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case, necessity so arises. 2 CWP No.2004 of 2017 decided alongwith connected matter on 03.08.2023. 3 CWP No. 3361 of 2025 decided a/w connected matters on 25.04.2026 4 Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24885/2026 3 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 11, 2026 (R.Atal)