APHC010375232024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1971/2024 Between: 1. BETHIREDDY SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE BETHIREDDY RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.1-18, AINAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAMMANDAL, WEST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. BETHIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY,, S/O. BETHIREDDY SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.1- 18, AINAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. BETHIREDDY VENKATA REDDY, S/O. LATE BETHIREDDY RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O. AINAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. BETHIREDDYSRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. LATE BETHIREDDY RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. BETHIREDDYCHANDRAVATHI, W/O. SRI BETHIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 4. BETHIREDDY SRIRAMA REDDY, S/O. BETHIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. BETHIREDDY CHELLAYAMMA, W/O. LATE BETHIREDDYBHEEMIREDDY, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO.93, PRASHANT NAGAR COLONY, NEAR SRIPURAM COLONY, DILSHUKNAGAR, HYDERABAD - 500 060. 6. BETHIREDDY LAKSHMIPATHI REDDY, S/O. LATE BETHIREDDYBHEEMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO.93, PRASHANT NAGAR COLONY, NEAR SRIPURAM COLONY, DILSHUKNAGAR, HYDERABAD - 500 060. 7. ANNAMREDDY VANI, W/O. ANNAMREDDYVISWANATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. AINAPARRU VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. BETHIREDDY NAGESWARA REDDY, S/O. LATE SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM. 9. CHINTA SATYAVANI, W/O. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM. 10. BETHIREDDYMANIKANTAREDDY, S/O. BETHIREDDY SRIRAM REDDY, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM. 11. BETHIREDDYMANIKANTA REDDY, S/O. BETHIREDDY SRIRAM REDDY, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM. 12. BETHIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. BETHIREDDY SRIRAM REDDY, AGED 6 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-327, OPPOSITE TO RTC BUS COMPLEX, JANGAREDDIGUDEM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be 3 pleased tobeg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the Order, dated 18- 06-2024, passed by the Court of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kovvur,in I.A.No.175 of 2019 in O.S.No.286 of 2011,for the following among the other grounds IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the Order, dated 18-06-2024, passed by the Court of the Principal Civil Judge(Senior Division), Kovvur, in I.A.No.175 of 2019 in O.S.No.286 of 2011,and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.175 of 2019 in O.S.No.286 of 2011 by the learned Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kovvur. 2. Sri Yadavalli Ramesh, learned counsel representing Sri Parimi Rama Rayudu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.V.Sowmya, learned counsel representing Sri K.Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents, collectively reported that the suit itself has been disposed of, as the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat, and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. 3. Registry has also placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 13.12.2025, the suit was disposed of. 4. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 09th February, 2026 JLV 5 471 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1971/2024 Date: 09th February, 2026 JLV