Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22644 (AP)

Manna Prarthana Mandiram v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25147/2020 · 2026-01-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010376692020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25147/2020 Between: MANNA PRARTHANA MANDIRAM, REGD NO. 24/2014, H NO. 87/13/74-15, BTR NAGAR, KURNOOL - 518 002, KURNOOL DISTRICT REP BY ITS PASTOR, K. PRAMOD KUMAR, 5/0. K. KARRENNA, AGED 40 YEARS, NAGAR, JOHARAPURAM VILLAGE, KURNOOL URBAN MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL URBAN DISTRICT, KURNOOL 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL URBAN MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. G ABDUL SATTAR, S/O. ABDUL RASOOL AGED MAJOR, RIO. H NO. 3-108-6, BALAJI NAGAR, KURNOOL ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.25147 of 2020 Dated 23.01.2026 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MURALI LINCOLN The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the petitioner, even on the last occasion also. The matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, and there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.01.2026 RSI 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.25147 of 2020 Dated 23.01.2026 98 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25147 of 2020 Date: 23.01.2026 RSI