Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22640 (AP)

B Venkata Ramanaiah v. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP(AT)/799/2021 · 2026-02-19

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010366622021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 799/2021 Between: 1. B VENKATA RAMANAIAH, S/O. B.VENKATA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT, 0/0. HNSS DIVISION NO.III, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, I AND CAD DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, , AVR HNSS CIRCLE NO.1, B. CAMP, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HNSS, DIVISION NO.LII, HNSS COMPOUND, BHAGYANAGAR, OPP. RR HOSPITAL, KURNOOL- 518 004. ...RESPONDENT(S): To call for the records relating to the impugned speaking order No.SE/HNSS.I/KNL/EC- 11/253 dated 15.04.2017 issued by the 3rd respondent wherein rejecting the claim of the applicant for declaration of his probation in the cadre of Junior Assistant though he was appointed under Land Displaced person quota under G.O.Ms.No.98, dated 15.04.1986 IS highly illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents consider the claim of the applicant for declaration of his probation in the cadre of Junior Assistant and consider his claim for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant and Superintendent on par with his juniors with all consequential benefits Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. NAYAKAWADI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following order: The petitioner originally filed O.A.No.1225 of 2017 on the file of learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad (for short „the Tribunal‟) to declare the action of the respondents in rejecting the claim of the petitioner for declaration of his probation in the cadre of Junior Assistant though he was appointed under Land Displaced person quota under G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. After the abolition of the Tribunal, the O.A. was transferred to High Court and the same is numbered as W.P.(APAT).No.799 of 2021. 3. The writ petition was listed on 06.02.2026, however, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition was directed to be listed on 13.02.2026, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even on 13.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. To give one more opportunity, the writ petition was adjourned to today. 4. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 5. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI 3 171 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION (AT) NO:799/2021 Dated: 20.02.2026 SNI