Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2264 (BOM)

CHANDRAKANT KISANLAL RODA (HUF) AND ANR v. THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF TAHSILDAR AND ORS

WP/10431/2026 · 2026-08-19

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Diksha Rane 4 WP 10431 2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10431 OF 2026 CHANDRAKANT KISANLAL RODA (HUF) AND ANR ..PETITIONERS VS THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF TAHSILDAR AND ORS ..RESPONDENTS Adv. Sushil M. Shukla a/w. Adv. Janki J. Sampat for petitioners. Mr. S. D. Chipade, AGP for respondent – State. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026. Per Court : 1. Learned AGP points out that against the impugned order an alternate remedy before the Sub-Divisional Officer is available to the petitioners. 2. Considering the same, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy of appeal. If such an appeal is filed, the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer would 19th AUGUST, 2026 2026:BHC-AS:34545 Diksha Rane 4 WP 10431 2026.docx take up the matter for hearing and pass appropriate orders thereafter, including an interim order, if required. 3. The delay caused in filing the present petition stands excluded in computing the period of limitation in filing the appeal. If the appeal is so filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same be decided on its own merits. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] 19th AUGUST, 2026 Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 21/08/2026 15:48:43