Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2264 (ALL)

SARJAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/3007/2026 · 2026-05-11

Subhash Chandra Sharma

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3007 of 2026 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. This criminal revision has been filed with prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 23.03.2026 passed by District and Sessions Judge, Basti in Criminal Appeal No.30 of 2026 (Sarjan vs. State of U.P. and another) by which appeal was dismissed at the admission stage since 20% amount was not deposited by the appellant within stipulated period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that since the revisionist is in jail at present and ready to make payment of 20% amount within a period of 30 days, therefore, order passed by learned appellate court dated 23.03.2026 be set aside and learned appellate court be directed to decide the appeal on merit after giving opportunity of hearing to the appellants. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A., perusal of record and the order passed by learned appellate court dated 23.03.2026, since, revisionist is ready to deposit 20% amount before the learned appellate court within a period of 30 days, therefore, the order dated 23.03.2026 passed by learned trial court is, hereby, set aside on condition that the revisionist will make deposit of the 20% amount as directed by the learned appellate court within 30 days. As the aforesaid amount is deposited by the revisionist, the learned appellate Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Tripurari Sharan Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sarjan .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) court will decide the appeal after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties on merit and also to entertain the application of the revisionist regarding suspension of sentence. Accordingly, this criminal revision is disposed of. May 12, 2026 Ashok Gupta CRLR No. 3007 of 2026 2 (Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad