[2026:JHHC:24541] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7687 of 2026 ------ Abdul Arman Khan @ Arman Khan @ Arman aged about 29 years Son of Abdul Shamim Khan @ Shamim Khan @ China, resident of Qr. No. 26/L-4, Road No. 3, Agrico, P.O. Agrico, P.S. Sitaramdera, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. J.S. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-17-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, has committed murder of Md. Taukir @ Gora. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the direct allegation is against the co-accused persons namely Vijay Pandey, Sadab Khan @ Billi and Masud Iqwal of firing upon the deceased and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has also threatened to abduct the victim. It is further submitted that except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no other material, except suspicion to show the involvement of the petitioner, in the alleged criminal conspiracy. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the co-accused has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.07.2026 in B.A. No.6783 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-19 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. The learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, at Jamshedpur, in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No.106 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.08.2026 Amar/