[2026:JHHC:24452] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7666 of 2026 ------ Kailash Yadav @ Panjiyara, aged about 45 years, Son of Mala Manijar Panjiyara, Resident of Village- Mal Rampur, P.O.- Mal Rampur, P.S.- Pathargama, District- Godda, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-14-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2)(a) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, has committed murder of Neeraj Kumar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the direct allegation of murder is against the sons of Sanjeev Panjiyara namely Aman Kumar Yadav, Suman Kumar Yadav and the brother of Sanjeev Panjiyara namely Diwakar Panjiyara, of assaulting Neeraj Kumar resulting in his death and the petitioner in this case has been implicated is this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of Sanjeev Kumar Panjiyara. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that the co- accused persons have been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7179 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted the petitioner has been in custody since 17.06.2026 mentioned in para-09 and has no criminal antecedents as has been mentioned in para -16 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 14.08.2026 Amar/