Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22621 (KAR)

SMT. THIPPAMMA v. DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER

MFA/3540/2019 · 2026-06-15

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28912 MFA No. 3540 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3540 OF 2019(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. THIPPAMMA, W/O BASAVARAJ, D/O LATE BHIMARAY, AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O NO.96/A, 5TH CROSS, KANTIRAVA STUDIO, NARASIMHA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560020. 2. GURAPPA, S/O LATE BHIMARAYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O NO.2, BAGALURU CROSS, PALANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560079. 3. RANGAPPA, S/O LATE BHIMARAYA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O BHILAHAR VILLAGE AND POST, SHAHAPURA TALUK, YADAGIRI DISTRICT - 585201 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KUMARA K G ., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28912 MFA No. 3540 of 2019 AND: 1. DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER STDC HOUSINGS BOARD COLONY, OPP. GOVT UNANI MEDICLE COLLEGE, GMS COMPOUND, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560079. 2. DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER RAMANAGARA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 562159. 3. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, T P HUB, 3RD FLOOR, SHUBHARAM COMPLEX, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MAMATHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE; V/O. DATED 29.05.2024, NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 ARE DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.07.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.8368/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, XVI ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU CITY(SCCH-14), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28912 MFA No. 3540 of 2019 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on appellants' side on call. 2. Ms.Mamatha appears through video conference representing Sri.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel on record for respondent No.3. There was no representation on appellants' side even on 15.04.2026. 3. On 15.04.2026, following order came to be passed: ”1. None appears for the appellants. 2. The translated copies as ordered by this Court on 15.09.2025 have also not been filed. 3. A final opportunity is granted to the appellants to file the same within four weeks, failing which the appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. List on 15.06.2026." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28912 MFA No. 3540 of 2019 4. On this day appellants neither represented nor have shown cause for non-filing of translated copies. These facts reveal that appellants are not interested in pursuing the matter. 5. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34