1 2026:CGHC:25271 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 712 of 2018 1. (Died), Ramnath Sahu, Through Legal Heir As Per Honble Court Order Dated 12-01-2024 And 14-02-2024. 1.1 - (A) Shrawan Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Ramnath Sahu Aged About 51 Years R/o Chandaniyapara, Behind Sharda Mandir, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 1.2 - (B) Vidya Shankar Sahu S/o Late Shri Ramnath Sahu Aged About 44 Years R/o Chandaniyapara, Behind Sharda Mandir, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 1.3 - (C) Smt. Sushil Sahu S/o Late Shri Ramnath Sahu Aged About 74 Years R/o Chandaniyapara, Behind Sharda Mandir, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 1.4 - (D) Smt. Divya Sahu D/o Late Shri Ramnath Sahu, W/o F.L. Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Dhirkoat, Janjgir, District-Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 1.5 - (E) Miss Ranjani Sahu D/o Late Ramnath Sahu Aged About 49 Years R/o Chandaniyapara, Behind Sharda Mandir, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Ramdayal Thakur Tehsildar, Akaltara, Tehsil Office Akaltara, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chunnu Tigga Station Incharge Mulmula Police Station, Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22.06 .2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed for disobedience of order dated SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.06.22 14:54:28 +0530 2 24.04.2018 passed in WP227 No. 359 of 2018, whereby, the Tahsildar, Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa was directed to conclude the proceedings of revenue case No. 41/A-70/16-17 within a period of 45 days, and thereafter, to take action in accordance with the law. 2. Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate would submit that till date the concerned Tahsildar has not concluded the proceedings of Section 248 of Land Revenue Code, 1959 despite the relevant order passed in the matter. He would submit that the respondent No. 1 has deliberately flouted the order passed by this Court. 3. On the other hand, Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate appearing for respondent No. 1 would submit that respondent No. 1 got retired from services on account of superannuation in the year 2022 and his whereabouts are not known. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the revenue case No. 41/A-70/16-17 has not been concluded as informed by Mr. Yogendra Pandey, the Tahsildar, Akaltara is directed to take action pursuant to order dated 24.04.2018 passed in WP227 No. 359 of 2018. 6. At this stage, this contempt petition is disposed of. Notices issued to respondents are hereby discharged. 7. The petitioner would be at liberty to apprise earlier order as well as order passed in this contempt petition to the concerned Tahsildar. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant