APHC010372142021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 860/2021 Between: 1. S B JAYARAM NAIK, S/O. DEVULA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, A.R. POLICE CONSTABLE NO. 2199, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVE, ANANTAPURAMU. ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU RANGE, ANANTAPURAMU. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SOUTH ZONE, RAYALASEEMA REGION, VIJAVAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P., VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): to call for the records relating to the impugned C.No. 4333/A6/PR/2012, D.O.No. 1199/2015, dated 1-8-2015 issued by the 1st respondent and the orders passed by the respondent in appeal vide C.No. 66/C2/AppI/RO/2015, 2 ROO.No. 540/2015, dated 29-10-2015 and the orders passed by the 3rd respondent in Revision Petition in Rc.No. 961/IGP/SZ/RR-1/2015, R.O.O.No. 23/2016, dated 1-2-2016 and the orders passed by the 4th respondent in Memo. L.Dis.No. 355/T2/2016, dated 20-6-2016 (communicated to the applicant by the 1st respondent in Memo. C.No. 1426/A6/2016, dated 27-6- 2016) and quash or set-aside the same as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution and also opposed to the law on the subject and consequently hold that the applicant is entitled for release of his annual increments withheld pursuant to the impugned proceedings with all consequential benefits including treating the suspension period as on duty, pay and allowances etc., Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A TIRUPATHI GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: The petitioners originally filed O.A.No.1632 of 2017 on the file of learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad (for short „the Tribunal‟), impugning the proceedings vide C.No.4333/A6/PR/2012, D.O.No.1199/2015 dated 01.08.2015, issued by the 1st respondent, confirmed in the appeal vide C.No.66/C2/Appl/RO/2015, ROO.No.540/2015 dated 29.10.2015 and further confirmed by the 3rd respondent in revision vide Rc.No.961/IGP/SZ/RR-1/2015, R.O.O.No.23/2016 dated 01.02.2016 and the orders passed by the 4th respondent in Memo.L.Dis.No.355/T2/2016 dated 20.06.2016 and set aside the said proceedings. 2. 2. After the abolition of the Tribunal, the O.A. was transferred to High Court and the same is numbered as W.P.(APAT).No.860 of 2021. 3. The writ petition was listed on 23.01.2026 and, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, was adjourned to 06.02.2026. On 06.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3 Accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed on 13.02.2026 under the caption “for dismissal.” On 13.02.2026 also, there was no representation for the petitioners. In order to give one more opportunity, the matter was adjourned to 20.02.2026. Even on 20.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, and the matter was adjourned to today as a last chance. 4. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioners. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 5. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 27.02.2026 SNI 4 336 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION (AT) NO:860/2021 Dated: 27.02.2026 SNI