Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22616 (CHH)

ANIL KUMAR DIXIT v. DURGA PRASAD

MA/133/2023 · 2026-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:CGHC:25185 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 133 of 2023 1 - Anil Kumar Dixit S/o Laxmi Narayan Aged About 52 Years R/o Sadar Bazar, Raipur (Plaintiff), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Durga Prasad S/o Late Ramsahay Aged About 60 Years R/o Dhusera. Tah. Abhanpur (Defendants), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Sumarit Bai D/o Late Ramsahay Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Davari Kurud, Tahsil Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajeshwar S/o Late Ramsahay Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Dhusera. Tah. Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Duacia Bai D/o Late Ramsahay Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Davari Kurud, Tahsil Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 5 - Dinesh Kumar S/o Late Ramsahay Aged About 28 Years Village Dhusera. Tah. Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Rajani D/o Late Ramsahay Aged About 28 Years Village Ghodhi Tahsil Mandir Hasod,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Raju Vaish S/o Late Bhagirath Aged About 69 Years R/o Tuta Tahsil Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Krishna Kumar S/o Raju Vaish Aged About 34 Years R/o Tuta Tahsil Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 9 - Ghanshyam S/o Raju Vaish Aged About 32 Years R/o Tuta Tahsil Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 10 - Harendra S/o Raju Vaish Aged About 30 Years R/o Tuta Tahsil Abhanpur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 11 - Smt. Kishna Bai @ Krishna Bai D/o Raju Vaish Aged About 36 Years R/o Mahanadi, Tahsil Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 12 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents -2- For Appellants : None appears even in two rounds For State/respondents : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. Heard. 2. Mr. Singh, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would submit that this appeal has been preferred against order dated 10.07.2023 passed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC. It is contended that Civil Suit No.15-A/2005 has already been concluded and thus, this appeal has become infructuous. 3. Recording the statement made by Mr. Singh, the present appeal is dismissed being rendered infructuous. sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha