IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 15693 of 2026. Decided on : 11 th September , 2026 Vidya Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation, Annexure P- 3, seeking applicability of Kuldeep Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 CWP No. 9484 of 2024, decided on 10.03.2026. 2 authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 11th September, 2026. (jai)