Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22613 (KAR)

LONGITUDE EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S ROYAL EXPORTS

CMP/36/2026 · 2026-06-15

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28938 CMP No. 36 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 36 OF 2026 BETWEEN: LONGITUDE EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE NO. 48, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. PRADIP PRABHAKAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NEERAJ SASTRY.,ADVOCATE) AND: M/S ROYAL EXPORTS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 79/80, MAIN ROAD, CHIKKA ADUGODI, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28938 CMP No. 36 of 2026 NEW EXTENSION, THAVAREKERE MAIN ROAD, DRC POST, BENGALURU - 560 029, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. NARENDRA MANGLANI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ABHISHEK H, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR B T., ADVOCATE) THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO APPOINT SRI. GANAPATI HEGDE, SENIOR ADVOCATE, OR ANY OTHER ADVOCATE AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR AND REFER THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO ARBITRATION AS PER CLAUSE 13 (1) OF THE LEASE DEED DATED 10.09.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE - C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28938 CMP No. 36 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioner is the landlord of an immovable property which is occupied by the respondent. The dispute between them relates to certain money claims by the petitioner and the claim for vacant possession. Mr. Neeraj Sastry, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the parties are in the midst of negotiations, and in fact, the in-principle- understanding is that the respondent will file an undertaking in the pending appeal in Commercial Appeal No.306/2026 with the commercial division of this Court agreeing to vacate and hand over possession of the subject property by 01.07.2026 with the petitioner agreeing to waive all money claims if possession is so delivered. Mr. Abhishek H, the learned counsel who appears for the respondent, when queried in the light - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28938 CMP No. 36 of 2026 of these submissions, states that such Affidavit of Undertaking would indeed be filed in the afore proceedings and that the matter is expected to be listed over the next one week. These submissions are taken on record, and the petition stands disposed of because the parties, as is obvious from the above, have agreed to resolve their dispute. However, this Court must observe that the petitioner must be at liberty to seek revival in case the Affidavit of Undertaking as now stated is not filed. With such liberty, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB