Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2261 (HP)

NAND LAL v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./288/2026 · 2026-03-10

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:HHC:6384 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Petition No.288 of 2026 Decided on: 10th March, 2026 Nand Lal .......Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced letter dated 09.03.2026 issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and office order dated 07.01.2026 passed by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), Una, District Una, H.P. The same are taken on record. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2026:HHC:6384 ) 2 3. A perusal of office order dated 07.01.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been granted higher pay-scale of Rs.40100/- after completion of two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of the LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma’s case. 4. In view of the above stated position, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is disposed of as such. However, it is made clear that in case the consequential benefits are not released in his favour within eight weeks from today, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the execution petition. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) March 10, 2026 Judge (naveen)