( 2026:JHHC:24505 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4181 of 2026 ------ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Singh, aged about 27 years, S/o Late Ramu Singh @ Devchand Singh, R/o Village –Kajri Khurd, P.O. & P.S. –Jandaha, District –Vaishali (Bihar). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.07 Dated- 14.08.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.161 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 26 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(1), 111(4), 308(1), 308(5), 308(6), 109, 326(g), 61 & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons armed with weapons arrived at coal siding and stopped the truck bearing registration no. OD-09V-1907 and set the truck on fire by spraying a inflammable substance and they also fired three rounds at the siding area and also threw leaflet in the name of Rahul Dubey and Pradip Ganjhu gang over which it was written that work must be stopped until the levy is paid and threatened to kill anyone who continues the work. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that without holding any Test Identification Parade, as mentioned in para -2 of the supplementary affidavit dated 11.06.2026, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.11.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is then submitted that so far no witness has been examined in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Latehar, in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.161 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 26 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14.08.2026 Sonu/