SAGARI NASKAR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/16215/2025 · 2026-06-10
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22605 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22605 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
M/L- 71 10/06/2026 Ct. No.-19 Aritra WPA 16215 of 2025
Sagari Naskar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Pronojit Roy Ms. Abira Bhattacharya ….for the petitioner
Mr. Rhitam Chatterjee ….for the State
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that through inadvertence the writ petition has been filed. He prays for leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Mr. Rhitam Chatterjee learned advocate, who usually represents the State is present in Court and is requested to appear in this matter. Let the appointment of Mr. be regularised by the concerned authority. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for by the learned advocate for the petitioner.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)