Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22599 (AP)

Y.Mallikharjuna Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5354/2021 · 2026-03-08

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010350642021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5354/2021 Between: 1.Y.MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, S/O PEDDA BRAHMAM AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PRACTISING ADVOCATE C-93 SVN COLONY, GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP AMARAVATHI 2.VAKITI NAGA MANI, W/O LATE SRINIVASARAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS HOUSE WIFE, R/O ADIGOPPULLA VILLAGE, DURGA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.SRINIVASA RAO NARRA 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been filed in C.C.No.434/2025 on the file of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Macherla. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.03.2026 VTS