APHC010369902021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1736/2021 Between: 1. SMT. K. VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O. K. GURUMURTHY, AGED 66 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.9/368, UPSTAIRS, D.M.M. GATE ROAD, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PACHIPALAPOLARAJU, The Special Deputy Tahsildar (Inams), O/o.the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Notice to the Respondent and punish the respondent under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for the willful disobedience of the order dated 10.12.2018 in WP.No.43501/2018 passed by his Lordship Sri Justice A.Rajasheker Reddy and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to dispose of the claim petitions of the petitioner dated 15.04.2018 pending before the Respondent forth with pending disposal of the above contempt case and to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead Smt.Sailaja Panigrahi, Deputy Tahsildar (Inam), O/o Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam as 2"^' respondent to the Contempt Case 1736 of 2021 in WP.No.43501 of 2018, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. P SUBASH 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.12.2018 passed in W.P.No.43501 of 2018. 2. Sri K.M.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that as per the directions of this Court dated 10.12.2018, orders have been passed on the petitioners’ applications, as such, the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with and there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought liberty to question the said orders before appropriate forum if necessity arises. 3 4. Taking their submissions into consideration, the Contempt Case is closed. The petitioners are aggrieved by the orders passed by the respondents, they are at liberty to question the same before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 18th February, 2026 RKS