Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:CGHC:25270
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 15 of 2025 1 - Mohd. Rashid S/o Late Mohd. Isuf, Aged About 73 Years Retired Assistant Welder, Office Of S.D.O. Minimata Bango Dam ( E And M ) Sub Division No. 01 Machadoli, Water Resources Department Katoghora District- Korba ( C.G.) R/o Qur. No. I- 90 Pullarside, Village- And Post- Machadoli ( Lalpur ) Katghora District- Korba ( C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - R. Suleman Toppo Secretary, Water Resources Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Indrajit Uike Engineer In Chief Water Resources Department Sihawa Bhawan New Raipur District- Raipur ( C.G.). 3 - G.K. Velunkar Chief Engineer Hasdev Kachhar Water Resources Department Bilaspur District- Bilaspur ( C.G.). 4 - J.R. Bajrangi Executive Engineer Water Resources Department Minimata Bango Dam Machadoli District Korba Chhattisgarh At Present Division Katghora District Korba Chhattisgarh. 5 - R.K. Patel Joint Director, Pension And Account Treasury Department Bilaspur Division, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For respondents No.2 & 4 : Ms. Priyanka Rai Mishra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 22.06.2026
1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has filed this contempt petition against alleged REKHA SINGH
-2- disobedience of order dated 23.02.2024 passed in WPS No.1187 of 2024, wherein, following observation was made :
“5 Considering the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for petitioners as well as the State based on decision taken in the matter of "Faguvaram Patel" (supra), these petitions are disposed of directing the respondents authorities to consider the claim of petitioners for grant of leave encashment in the light of order passed in the matter of "Faguvaram Patel (supra) within a period of 03 months from the date of production of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and supporting documents.”
3. Mr. Khare, Advocate would submit that till date, respondents have not complied with the order dated 23.02.2024 and failed to make payment of leave encashment. 4. Ms. Rai, Advocate would submit that pursuant to order passed in WPS No.1187 of 2024, amount of leave encashment was calculated to the tune of Rs.58212/- and has already been paid to the petitioner and this fact is evident from Annexure R/2 & 4/1 dated 04.02.2025. 5. Heard. 6.
Perusal of document dated 04.02.2025 would show that amount of leave encashment was calculated but with regard to payment, there is no receipt or document. 7. Recording the statement made by Ms. Rai, this contempt petition is hereby disposed of. Notice issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Rekha