1 2026:CGHC:25273 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 165 of 2026 1. Sarvesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shankar Lal Yadav Aged About 38 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As Sarveshwar Kumar Yadav In Impugned Order Dated 28-04-2026) Presently Posted As Designated Officer, O/o Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Near Nehru Garden, District Hospital Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Siddharth Pandey S/o Ram Shiromadi Pandey Aged About 37 Years Presently Posted As Designated Officer, O/o Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Khairagarh, District- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Controller, Food And Drug Administration Department Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Food Safety Commissioner 4th Floor, Block-1, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, (C.G.) 4. Ajay Singh Presently Posted As Designated Officer, O/o Deputy Director, Food And Durg Administration, Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.) 5. Aparna Arya W/o Diwakar Rao Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Designated Officer, O/o The Dy. Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, (C.G.) 6. Rakhi Thakur D/o Shri Bhagwan Singh Thakur Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted And Working As Senior Food Safety Officer, O/o The Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Jashpur (C.G.) District- Jashpur (C.G.) 7. Sarita Patel D/o Shri Sagar Dutta Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted And Working As Food Safety Officer, O/o The Dy. Director, Food And Drug Administration, Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District- Raigarh, (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Review Petitioners : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate For State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Dy. Government SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.06.22 13:42:47 +0530 2 Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22.06 .2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this review petition with liberty to avail remedy available under the law. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant