[ 2026:JHHC:5363] 1 Cr.M.P. No. 487 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 487 of 2026 ----- Chintu Saw, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Hari Saw, resident of 74, Jamhara Road, Khurd, P.O. & P.S. Chando, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. ...... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .….. Opposite Party ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Srivastava , Adv. For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl. PP ----- P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties. 2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS with the prayer for quashing and setting aside the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro in connection with NDPS Case No. 06 of 2025 arising out of Petarwar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 whereby and where under, the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro has issued proclamation under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. without fixing time and place for appearance of the accused persons of the case, including the petitioner of this Petition. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro in connection with NDPS Case No. 06 of 2025 arising out of Petarwar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 is not sustainable in law as the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro has failed to fix the time and place for appearance of the accused persons, in respect of whom, the proclamation under Section 82 of CrPC has been issued, hence, it is submitted that the prayer as made in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition be allowed. 4. Learned Spl. PP on the other hand submits that the petitioner who is the accused person of the case, are expected to appear before the court concerned, during the court hours on any day, after 30 days of the proclamation, hence, no illegality has been [ 2026:JHHC:5363] 2 Cr.M.P. No. 487 of 2026 committed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro. It is lastly submitted that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition being without any merit, be dismissed. 5. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials available in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that it is a settled principle of law that the court which decides to issue proclamation under Section 82 of CrPC after being satisfied that the accused person of the case is absconding or concealing himself to evade his arrest, then such court must fix time and place for appearance of the accused person, in respect of whom, the proclamation under Section 82 of CrPC is issued, in the order itself, by which such proclamation is ordered to be issued. 6. Now coming to the facts of the case, the undisputed fact remains that the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro has not mentioned any time or place for appearance of the accused persons of the case, including the petitioner herein in respect of whom order has been passed to issue the proclamation under section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the impugned order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro in connection with NDPS Case No. 06 of 2025 arising out of Petarwar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 is not sustainable in law. 7. Accordingly, the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro in connection with NDPS Case No. 06 of 2025 arising out of Petarwar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 is quashed and set aside qua the petitioner only. 8. The learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro may pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 9. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent only. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated, the 24th February, 2026 Madhav /AFR Uploaded on 25/02/2026