[ 2026:JHHC:22413] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4200 of 2026 Md. Nasim Sheikh @ Md. Nasim Sk, aged about-43 years Son of Md. Sharaful Sheikh, Resident of Village- Hindupara Sultanganj, P.O. Sultanganj, P.S. Kaliyachak, District-Malda (West Bengal). ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Malsi Pathak, A.C. to P.P. ------ 05/ 29.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 201 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 20/22 of the NDPS Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the heroin has been recovered from the possession of one Md. Shamsul Haque and that person has taken the name of this petitioner and stated that he has purchased the same from this petitioner. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the serious allegations are there against the petitioner of selling the heroin, which has been recovered from the apprehended co-accused. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. There are parameters of granting regular bail or [ 2026:JHHC:22413] -2- anticipatory bail in the cases arising out of NDPS and further the petitioner is said to be the seller of the heroin, which has been recovered from the apprehended co-accused. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-29.07.2026 Amitesh/-