N.SRINIVAS RAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. v. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND APPELLATE UTHORITY, KRISHNA
WP/22097/2002 · 2026-01-21
Challa Gunaranjan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22583 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22583 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010350642002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 22097/2002 Between: 1.N.SRINIVAS RAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., S/O. SEETA RAMANJANEYULU, AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANT, (DISCHARGE) S.B.I TANUKU (BR), R/O. 33-1-1, BEHIND ANDHRA BANK, SEETARAMPURAM, ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND APPELLATE UTHORITY KRISHNA, STATE BANK OF INDIA D.P. SECTION, ZONAL OFFICE AT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, REGION-IV, D.P SECTION, STATE BANK OF INIDA, ZONAL OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Ceritiorari and call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the second respondnet bearing No. DPS/R-IV/No.63, dated 15-08-2000 and proceedings of the First Respondnet bearing No. DPS/DGM/2, dated 6-4-2001 and quashed the same who discharged the petitioner from service as the said proceedings are illegal, irregular arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice with consequential direction to the Respondent to re-institate the petitioner into the service of the Bank forthwith with continuity of service and back wages with all consequential benefits, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 27704 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for final hearing of the Writ Petition as the petitioenr out of employment and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S SRINIVASA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.E MADAN MOHAN RAO 2.K B RAMANNA DORA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION No.22097 of 2002
ORDER:
On the last occasions, i.e., on 01.09.2025 & 16.10.2025, there was no representation on either side.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. B. Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the respondents, is present. It appears that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the matter.
3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim
order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANAJAN Date: 22.01.2026 CVD