Beesaabathini Veera Venkata Rama Vara Prasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/5533/2021 · 2026-02-26
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22582 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22582 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010364012021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5533/2021 Between:
1. BEESAABATHINI VEERA VENKATA RAMA VARA PRASAD, S/O.
RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. 44-15-78, LENIN NAGAR, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HIGH COURT OF A.P.
AT AMARAVATHI.
2. M/S EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED, REP.BY ITS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER A.S.SIVA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.DURGA RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O.AREA/BRANCH OFFICE AT PLOT NO.34, MBL HEIGHTS,
2ND FLOOR, PANTAKALUVA ROAD, TEACHERS COLONY,
PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-520008, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtto call for the entire records of complaint bearing C.F.No.3896 of 2019 on the file of the court of the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada and quash the same for non compliance of procedure under Sec. 156 and 154 of Cr.P.C in so far as the petitioner/accused No.7 is concerned and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No.671/2019 dated 04-09-2019 on the file of S.H.O. Patamata P.S, Krishna District pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. KUNUKU RAJA SEKHAR
The Court made following: ORDER:
No representation for the Petitioner.
Ms. P. Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a charge sheet has already been filed.
In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the charge sheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date:27.02.2026 JLSR